Publication: Investigative Utility of the Cognitive Interview (Law and Human Behavior)

Ever wonder why jurors see the same evidence but reach wildly different conclusions? The courtroom is not just a battle of facts; it’s a battle against hidden psychological biases shaping each juror’s interpretation of the evidence. Although jurors are asked to make decisions solely based

What Sean “Diddy” Comb’s Trial Verdict Reveals about Juror Decision-Making In Emotionally Charged, High-Profile Cases The 2025 Sean “Diddy” Combs trial has captivated the public with its blend of celebrities, allegations of violence, and claims of organized sex trafficking. Yet, behind the headlines, the verdict

October 2021 – Senior trial consultant, Dr. Geri Fischman discussed with Law.com how jurors have approached scientific and medical evidence and testimony since the pandemic. She also addresses whether the political polarization surrounding COVID has seeped into the jury pool. A recently refitted courtroom in